CategoryBrowser

Block Ads and Tracking with Hosts File and NoScript

Adblock Plus

Browser plugin solutions for blocking ads such as Adblock Plus have become increasingly popular; at the time of this post ABP is the most used Firefox extension. For the uninitiated, ad blocking plugins work by offering various filters to block your browser from downloading from certain domains over the HTTP and HTTPS protocols. At first glance this seems like the ultimate solution and certainly is a good one but it has a few notable and often overlooked drawbacks compared to other solutions.

Hosts File and Advantages

The hosts file is a plain text file that resides on your computer and serves your operating system with mapping hostnames to IP addresses. That definition contains an inline explanation as to why editing your hosts file has more advantages than using ad blocking plugins. For one, because the hosts file serves your operating system at a native level, it has a performance edge compared to ad blocks happening at the browser level. Plugins can be a large burden on already resource intensive browsers due to their runtime nature as well as bugs that result in excess resource hogging. Hosts file blocking can be used with relative effectiveness against known malicious domains that may attempt to compromise your computer through other channels. Browser level blocking deals solely with the HTTP and HTTPS protocols whereas hosts file changes block all connections across all TCP/IP protocols including SSH and FTP. On top of all of that, this can be an additional method to disable or hinder tracking on top of solutions offered by software like ABP. It is important to note that there simple workarounds such as using a hardcoded IP address rather than a domain to launch an attack; therefore, as always, a motivated attacker using a targeted attack will not be deterred.

Getting Started

The first step is to find your hosts file depending on your operating system which you can edit using a text editor such as Notepad.

File Location and Editing

Note: You may lack permissions to save to the directory and will be therefore required to create a new file outside the directory and replace it. Be sure to copy the old hosts file just in case. Also be sure to save as a plain text file—a file with no extension, not even a “.txt” extension. I used Notepad++ to achieve this.

Windows location: C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts
Linux location: \etc\hosts
OSX location: \private\etc\hosts

Simple Hosts File Edit

For this demonstration I am going to add just one rule to the hosts file. By adding the following line, the domain “ad.doubleclick.net” will resolve to 0.0.0.0 which is your local machine. This means that anytime that your browser is prompted to download anything from “ad.doubleclick.net” it will block the request and resolve it to your local machine, thereby not displaying the ad.

Simple addition of rule to block DoubleClick

Simple addition of rule to block DoubleClick

I use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1 because I believe it performs a bit faster since 127.0.0.1 waits for a timeout and I often use 127.0.0.1 for development purposes.

Possible Anti-virus Conflicts

Upon saving the hosts file you may run into a problem with anti-virus software detecting a possible hijacking. A relatively common form of attack is to indeed edit the hosts file and resolve domains to malicious addresses; therefore, Windows Defender immediately comes to my aid. In order to make changes, you have to first add the file in whatever anti-viruses exclusion list. Below is the navigation in Windows Defender where I would click ‘Add’ and it would appear below the input in the list of exclusions.

Windows Defender Navigation

Windows Defender Navigation

NoScript

NoScript is a browser plugin much like ABP in that it blocks content similarly. The difference is that by default NoScript blocks all JavaScript and other extra content. In order to use NoScript you have to individually whitelist content, causing your browser to reload the page and run accordingly. This is done using the dropdown and click-to-allow interface.

Example of the NoScript interface

Example of the NoScript interface

There is a noticeable advantage to security and performance by allowing you to decide what content you see from the webpage the first time you visit. Performance is enhanced since you’ve limited the amount of scripts running to only those you allow and deem important. Security is present because you get to personally allow content rather than it just being downloaded automatically without your consent or even knowledge. This allows you time to look up what you’re allowing before giving consent to run.

So-Called Breaking Browsing Experience

Developers might be displeased to think that you are viewing their content how you deem fit but NoScript certainly gives the power back to the user who is ultimately vulnerable otherwise. The amount of content that must be whitelisted often reflects on the reputation of the site itself. For instance accessing Wikipedia might only require me to quickly click-to-whitelist “wikipedia.org” and “wikimedia.org”.

However accessing any sort of reputable or otherwise news publication may involve me deciding what to allow from a list of 10+ requests. Adblock Plus and NoScript “break” the browsing experience in the sense that the developer controls what content you allow. Adblock Plus simply breaks content it deems as ads while NoScript breaks most of the extra content on the site and allows you to rebuild it yourself by what you allow. You can however easily allow all scripts on the page with NoScript should you tire of dealing with the system.

ABP, NoScript, Hosts Combination Benchmarks

The reason I use a combination of NoScript and my hosts file is because it offers a considerable performance boost as well as the most safety. As browsers in general are huge resource burdens it is rather easy to resist the temptation to use both NoScript and Adblock Plus plugins. NoScript uses less resources than Adblock Plus, allows less scripts to run by default, and uses less bandwidth because of this. Below is a table showing the bandwidth benchmarks for a few possible configurations, MVPS is the name of a popular Hosts file that blocks known ad servers.

Bandwidth saving percentages highlighted in red

A few of the bandwidth saving percentages highlighted in red. Source: IANIX

Here we see the ideal configuration for bandwidth and security is using NoScript in conjunction with hosts file blocking to edge out the most bandwidth efficiency possible of the combinations.

Importance of Ads

It is good to remember that ads are an important source of revenue for sites and by allowing them to run you are already supporting them. I stress an emphasis on fair and reasonable ad allowance and for that reason I myself do not block tracking from Google’s DoubleClick or AdSense. However, I always believe it is important to exercise your freedom to maintain the level of privacy and security that allows us all to comfortably use the web.

It’s important to decide if editing your hosts file is for you as it may require upkeep and hinder browsing experience depending on whether you plan on using it for simply blocking ads or as a shortcut to DNS lookup for some of your most visited sites. If you plan on using a large hosts file of your own or a community one such as MVPS HOSTS which can be found here, it is necessary to disable the DNS Client service from your computer in order to prevent a notable performance hit.

Disable Some Site Barriers, Blocks, Surveys, Ads, Banners, Etc.

We have all experienced some element displayed on a webpage that didn’t quite sit well with us, whether it was an ad or some content wall requiring pay or survpay—payment in the form of survey completion (a fate often worse than actual payment). Thanks to browser developers keeping other developers in their thoughts, anyone who has updated their Firefox and Chrome browsers in the last half decade has access to this solution. So what I’m writing about here is manipulating HTML/XHTML/XML elements after they’re interpreted and rendered by your browser. But before I lose anyone, let me reassure that anyone can do this simply with a couple of right and left clicks in a matter of seconds with little understanding.

Note: Since deleting elements simply deletes them from your browser’s display to you, any changes can be easily reverted by reloading the webpage. No harm, no foul. Few developers check for deleted elements and I have never encountered any sort of user-punishment from the few that do. Keep in mind, any server-side logic such as requiring (as opposed to suggesting) login will not be able to be bypassed using this method if server-side logic is keeping you from accessing content.

DOM Structure

By now all browsers support the standard conventional representation of objects in HTML/XHTML/XML documents—the Document Object Model or DOM for short. So when you visit a webpage, your browser downloads the HTML, parses the HTML and organizes the elements that make up the document as nodes in a tree structure. The tie-in here is that you can delete these nodes and therefore delete them from your viewing. Nearly everything you view on a webpage is an element or series of elements, from the ‘Submit’ button to the annoying ad banner to the login form, all elements that get constructed as nodes.

Firefox and Chrome Element Inspector

Firefox and Chrome both have developer tools which can be accessed by right-clicking and selecting ‘Inspect Element’ or the hotkeys Ctrl+Shift+I. If you use the right-click option it will highlight the node corresponding to the element you clicked on. Simply hover over the highlighted text, right-click and select ‘Delete Node’. Below is an example of the navigation in Firefox, sharing a similar layout to Chrome. The tools can be closed by the ‘X’ I have highlighted or by using the hotkey again.

Me about to delete the node allowing me to write this post

Me about to delete the node allowing me to write this post

Applying This To Blocks, Ads and Ethics

This will remain a rather simple but useful rudimentary solution that’s good to keep in your tool belt as a browser user. For instance it can also be used to save pictures that you are prevented from saving via right-click options menu.Hopefully I have explained this out in such a way that its uses require little imagination. I consider content walls the ultimate ‘gotcha’, bait and switch. It’s also rather quick and painless to do and is certainly a worthy way to closing any malicious pop-ups without having to worry about accidentally clicking on them.

While I understand the importance of ads and don’t condone closing them all, this is useful for closing annoying banner ads when streaming or otherwise recording your screen as well. And as far as anyone is concerned, you have to look at the ad to delete it so technically in the end they inevitably still win.

That being said, be sure to check out my upcoming post where I discuss blocking ads universally at their source using the hosts file as well as other solutions.

© 2025 Brian Boll

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑